Live · Updated every 15 minutes
Accuracy Ledger
Every study GodlyDeeds generates is checked against scripture, labeled by interpretive method, and audited for scholarly balance. The numbers below are live. When we get something wrong, it appears in the correction log.
Last 30 days · 121 studies generated
Fact-check pass rate
≥ 95%100.00%
Share of studies whose cited scripture references were verified line-by-line against the canonical text.
Content-filter flag rate
≤ 2%0.00%
Share of generations flagged by content moderation. Lower is better.
Parse-error rate
≤ 1%2.41%
Share of studies that failed structural validation and were regenerated automatically.
User-reported corrections (30 days)
Total reported
0
Resolved
100%
Correction rate
0.00%
Per 1,000 studies
0.0
Factual0
0.0/1k studies
Citation0
0.0/1k studies
Doctrinal0
0.0/1k studies
Method0
0.0/1k studies
Balance0
0.0/1k studies
Recent corrections
No corrections reported yet. When users flag an error, it will appear here.
How we define accuracy
- Scripture grounding. Every scripture reference is verified against the canonical verse text before a study is delivered. Failed verifications trigger regeneration, not silent correction.
- Interpretive method. Every study declares its interpretive approach — grammatical-historical, typological, canonical, redemptive-historical. Typological readings are only permitted when the New Testament explicitly warrants them.
- Scholarly balance. Contested theological claims must ship with counter-evidence — the scholars who disagree and why. Studies that fail this check are rewritten, not published.
- Citation density. Every claim carries at least two evidence items. Claims that cannot be sourced are labeled as speculative or removed.
- Public corrections. When a user reports an error, it appears on this page. Nothing is quietly patched.